Start with the signal
Bring relevant news, web, social, and video coverage into the workspace with a link back to the original source.
SIGNALA shared decision room for communications teams
Bring evidence, the current assessment, decisions, owners, and linked response content into one shared Situation. Send an exact saved version for no-account external review, then keep a trace of what was decided and done.
Humans decide. StoryOps keeps the context, activity, and version history together. It does not autonomously publish response content.
See StoryOps bring coverage together and turn an important signal into coordinated response work.
Built around professional judgement
StoryOps does not automate trust, persuasion, client relationships, or the final call. It keeps evidence and internal responsibilities visible and records what was agreed, so meetings can focus on the decision instead of rebuilding context.
Evidence stays closeKeep source links and attached evidence beside the team’s assessment and response.
People own the workAssign internal owners and due dates, record decisions and rationale, and keep the follow-up visible.
Nothing publishes itselfResponse content remains under authorised-user control. It is locked while under review; changes require a return to Draft and a new review round.
One coordinated response workflow
Bring relevant news, web, social, and video coverage into the workspace with a link back to the original source.
SIGNALKeep evidence, the current assessment, agreed position, key messages, internal tasks, and decisions in one working record.
SITUATIONSend an expiring, no-account review link. Reviewers can comment, approve, or request changes to that saved version.
REVIEWPreserve the decision and follow-up work. Build source-linked coverage and baseline reports from the relevant subject, with estimates and limitations visible.
FOLLOW-UPWhy dedicated software?
One-off prompts are useful, but communications work also involves changing evidence, shared context, assigned work, controlled versions, external review, and a record the team can return to.
Context that persistsCoverage and evidence stay attached to the relevant person, organisation, and Situation.
Work with accountabilityTasks, owners, due dates, decisions, and rationale remain part of the shared record.
Review with version controlA saved version cannot quietly change while it is under review; later edits require a new review round.
Reporting with contextSource-linked coverage, labelled estimates, and baseline limitations stay visible to the people reading the report.
The repeatable work
Rebuild context for every meetingOpen one current Situation record
Chase internal owners and actions across inboxesKeep tasks and due dates beside the evidence
Reconcile comments across conflicting draftsReview one exact, saved version at a time
Rebuild every coverage report from scratchWork from saved, source-linked coverage
Force activity into a simplistic ROI numberShow observational context and its limitations
Questions
PR agency account teams and in-house communications teams managing issues where executive, legal, client, or subject-expert input and review matter.
No. StoryOps organises evidence and prepares reviewable starting points. Your team owns the strategy, relationships, judgement, editing, and final decisions.
A chatbot handles a conversation and a project tool handles tasks. StoryOps brings monitored coverage, Situations, controlled response versions, and external review into one communications workspace, with reporting available from the relevant subject coverage.
Monitoring is the starting point. StoryOps also connects coverage to Situations, internal tasks, controlled response versions, external review, and subject-level reporting. Whether it replaces another tool depends on the sources and workflow your team needs.
No—and that is not the goal. StoryOps reduces the preparation and rework around the human conversation by keeping evidence, internal ownership, decisions, and the exact response under review together.
StoryOps does not claim automatic causal attribution. It helps teams define objectives, record measures, compare coverage around an intervention, and keep estimates or insufficient-baseline warnings visible. The result is observational context, not a magic ROI number.
StoryOps keeps the underlying coverage and documents available for inspection. Message Impact findings include supporting excerpts and human-verification controls. Other AI-assisted outputs remain reviewable starting points rather than approved facts.
StoryOps supports configured news and RSS feeds, web coverage, X, Reddit, Bluesky, Lemmy, YouTube, and TikTok. Review sites and Irish or UK parliamentary records are available where configured. LinkedIn and Substack are not currently native sources.
Send an expiring review link for an exact saved version—no StoryOps account required. Reviewers can comment, approve, or request changes. Later edits make the outstanding link stale so a different version cannot be mistaken for the reviewed one. External decisions are recorded against that version; your team still controls internal approval and the Published status.
No. An authorised user must explicitly mark response content as Published. That is a workflow status inside StoryOps; the product does not distribute the response to media or social channels.
Focused walkthrough
Tell us about a recent issue, decision, or review bottleneck. We’ll show how its evidence, internal owners, saved response versions, and external review fit together in StoryOps.
Rather just get started? Start a free trial — no walkthrough required.
We’ll be in touch at .
You’re requesting a personal follow-up about StoryOps. We won’t share your details.